FREE ESSAY ON LIFE OR DEATH

LIFE OR DEATH

Murder! Rape! Terrorism! Most consider the people that commit these heinous crimes, but
some say these people deserve a second chance. The Debate over the merits of capital
punishment has endured for years, and continues to be an extremely complicated issue.
Adversaries of capital punishment point to the Marshalls and the Millgards, while
proponents point to the Dahmers and Gacys. Capital punishment is the legal infliction of
the death penalty on persons convicted of a crime (Cox). It is not intended to inflict
any physical pain or any torture; it is only another form of punishment. It is
irrevocable because it removes those punished from society permanently, instead of
temporarily imprisoning them. The usual alternative to the death penalty is life-long
imprisonment.
Capital punishment is a method of retributive punishment as old as civilization itself.
The death penalty has been imposed throughout history for many crimes, ranging from
blasphemy and treason to petty theft and murder. Many ancient societies accepted the idea
that certain crimes deserved capital punishment. Ancient Roman and Mosaic law endorsed
the notion of retaliation; they believed in the rule of an eye for an eye. Similarly, the
ancient Egyptians, Assyrians, and Greeks all executed citizens for a variety of crimes.
The most famous people to be executed are Socrates and Jesus. Only in England, during the
reigns of King Canute and William the Conqueror was the death penalty not used, although
the results of interrogation and torture were often fatal. 
In looking back to previous societies that relied upon the death penalty, such as ancient
Athens and the Roman Empire, one realizes the effectiveness of this sentence and its
usefulness as a tool for deterring crime (Pro Death Penalty 3). Although there is no
punishment that can entirely eliminate violent crime, a more stringent use of the death
penalty would significantly help.
Those who are for the death penalty argue the following points:
"Last October, Louisiana executed a man named Ernest Knighton. Knighton had killed a gas
station owner during a robbery. Like any murder this was a terrible crime. But it was not
premeditated, and is the sort of crime that very rarely results in a death sentence. Why
was Knighton electrocuted when everyone else who commits this same crime was not? Was it
because he was black"( Bruck,1985, P. 483).
According to deathpenalty.org, 54% of death row inmates are black. Why is race always an
issue? This man murdered an innocent man and the author is defending him. Thousands of
people will attack the death penalty. Victims family should be physically sickened when
they think about how monsters gets three meals a day and a bed to sleep in, while someone
they loved dearly lies dead in a coffin because of his actions. They will give emotional
speeches about the one innocent man or woman who might accidentally get an execution
sentence, and certainly that is a serious concern. However, all of these people are
forgetting one crucial element. They are forgetting the thousands of victims who die
every year by the hands of heartless criminals. There are more murderers out there than
people who are wrongly convicted, and that is what we must remember. The Bible can be
enterpeted many ways but this is clear "Whomever sheds a man's blood, by man shall his
blood be shed."(Genesis 9:6) The death penalty saves lives in that, by executing
murderers, you prevent them from murdering again. Why should we let people who have been
convicted of murder not be given the same punishment as what they did to their victims?
Most convicted murderers and their lawyers plead for life instead of the death penalty.
If they were tough enough to rape a little kid they should be tough enough to take the
punishment?
Those who oppose capital punishment bring to light the following arguments. When
committing a serious crime does it occur to the criminal that, if Caught, he/she could
be, electrocuted, gassed, or lethally injected? I highly doubt it. So why do people who
support the capital punishment call it a deterrent? The death penalty violates
constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. Although murderers come
from all classes, those on death row are almost without exception poor and were living in
poverty at the they were arrested. Capital punishment discriminates against the poor. The
majority of death row inmates are represented by court appointed public defenders- and
the state is not obligated to provide an attorney at all for appeals beyond the state
level. 
Our criminal justice system is very flawed. For example 
"Roosevelt Green was executed in Georgia two days before J.C. Shaw. Green and an
accomplice kidnapped a young woman. Green swore that his companion shot her to death
after Green had left, and that he knew nothing about the murder. Green's claim was
supported by a statement that his accomplice made to a witness after the crime. The jury
never resolved whether Green was telling the truth, and when he tried to take a polygraph
examination a few days before his scheduled execution, the state refused to allow the
examiner into the prison"( Bruck,1985, P. 482)
That is just one case. The criminal Justice system is so overworked no one really knows
how many innocent people are on death row. It costs $2.8 million to try a capital case,
over twice the cost of life in prison. (Deathpenalty.org) Proponents to the death penalty
point to cost but as the numbers clearly show it is less expensive to incarcerate then
kill. According to that same website 89 innocent men have been sentenced to death in the
last 20 years. 
If the Criminal Justice system was not flawed why would the following be introduced
"Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI), and Representative Jesse Jackson Jr. (D-IL). have
introduced legislation in the senate and house calling for a moratorium on all executions
while a blue-ribbon task force reviews the system of capital punishment in America.
Senator Feingold has also introduced legislation to abolish the Federal Death penalty.
Sen. Leahy (D-VT) has introduced legislation requiring DNA testing to be made available
to all inmates who have a claim of innocence."(Deathpenalty.org). Certainly advocates for
the abolishing the death penalty have valid concerns.
Although this is a very complicated and complex issue after weighing the pro's and con's.
Reforms are needed to the criminal Justice system to ensure that a level playing field is
established. The majority of minorities use public defenders. Statistics don't lie public
defenders are over worked and under paid. If we want Society must be kept safe from the
monstrous barbaric acts of these individuals and the only way to guaranty they don't
strike again is to take there life. The death penalty will never be fool proof but if
reforms are made it will sure be close to it.
Bibliography
N/A