FREE ESSAY ON FRENCH REVOLUTION

FRENCH REVOLUTION

True the ideas that were promoted by the philosophies were a contributor to The 
French Revolution but they were not the cause. The cause was the economic and social 
problems that faced France in those years of turmoil. I believe that The French 
Revolution was caused by The Social and Economic woes of the days. 
The rule of the aristocracy lasts as long as the rural population continues to 
ignore or neglect the crafts, and the ownership of land continues to be the soul basis of

wealth. When handicrafts and commerce take hold among the people and create a 
new source of wealth benefiting a new class of working people, this paves the way for a 
revolution in political structure. A new distribution of wealth opens the way to a new 
distribution of power. In the same way that the possession of land creates an
aristocracy, 
industrial property increases the power of the people; it provides the means to 
achieve its freedom. Antoine P. J. M. Barnave also believed that without the economic 
tribulations that were pending in France there would have been no need for change. 
The third estate could be broken down into three parts: the rich, bourgeoisie; the 
middle, lawyers, doctors, businessmen; and the poor, the peasant, farmer. There was 
much change in the economic world of the third estate. For instance the bourgeois were 
gaining land and therefore making money. 35% of the land was left to the 22 to 23 
million peasants, the bourgeoisie held about 30% of the land, the 350 000 members of 
the nobility held about 20% of the land, and left with an unequally shared 10% the 
130,000 member of the clergy. This shows how much land the bourgeois actually had. 
They were making large amounts of money off this huge percentage of land. Like those 
today who make money they needed to be taxed, there was only one difference between 
now and then, they [the third estate] were the only ones being taxed. Being the only ones

taxed the bourgeoisie were carrying France on their backs for the greater part of the
18th 
century. For this they wanted to gain ground into a better life one associated with royal

power . According to the Aristocracy there was to be no hope for the bourgeoisie, they 
could not gain ground, ever. One had to be born into their social class, for them this
was 
too bad. The Aristocracy believed that one could be as prosperous as they wanted and as 
prosperous as they could get but there was no way to socially climb the ladder. Because 
of this the bourgeoisie decided to look to the other members of the third estate, the 
peasants. 
There was many other Economic woes that plagued France in the 18th century. 
There was much poverty throughout the country, but only within the poor part of the third

estate. The first and second estates were well off and could not lose their fortunes to
the 
taxes that the third estate paid. There was much turmoil between the rich and the poor. 
When the poor were getting prosperous the rich would not let them climb socially. 
Privilege was something that every man, woman, child wanted in the 18th century 
desired. This was never going to be possible without some sort of upheaval in the 
political system that was in place. But in the eighteenth century the nobility like the 
aristocracy tended to close its ranks. This did not allow for a prosperous person in the

third estate to climb up to the second estate. After the enlightenment, social mobility
was 
shown to be a great step into modern society. If one could move socially then there was 
hope into their future that one could better their lives to make them easier and more 
prosperous. Without this social upheaval there would be no means to the revolution. 
During the eighteenth century, France went through many years of economic 
disorder. France's treasury had been drained throughout the years through frivolous 
spending, wars, and lack of fund rejuvenation. Louis XIV, XV, and XVI 
had been spending big throughout their years as head of state. Many years of their 
frivolous spending had drained the French treasury, over extravagant state dinners, new 
palace building, restoration, and inane amounts of money spent on personal artifacts and

private spending. 
Wars throughout the eighteenth century also had drained the French treasury. 
Many countries had been through large wars with France. Their budget on their army was 
gastronomically, their war-debt was extensive and to pay for all of these 
France went strait to the treasury. The reconstruction of the torn war zones were rebuilt

by France, again France looked to the treasury. 
All of these huge amounts of money that were taken from the treasury, this leads 
to a treasury drain sooner or later. Whether or not the head of state realized that
without 
proper restoration one day, they would turn to the treasury and it 
would be bare. The Third Estate was the only class in France that was being taxed in the

eighteenth century. The bourgeoisie were in the upper social and economic class of The 
Third Estate. The bourgeoisie and the peasants of the third estate were the economic 
backbone of France during the eighteenth century. Although one can look and suppose 
that the 24 500 000 people that were part of the third estate could easily hold the 
economy of France would suppose wrong. 96% of those in the third estate were peasants 
and were in only the 1% tax bracket of a minuscule income. The other 4% of the third 
estate were the main economic backbone of France. The bourgeoisie were holding up the 
legs of France and all that they wanted was to Suppress privilege and acquire equal 
rights. 
The economic upheaval of France could have been attributed to the political 
blunders and intellectual advancements of the eighteenth century. The American 
Revolution sent many messages to the third estate that through force one could change 
the wrongs that they saw happening around them. Without the social and economic 
problems that faced those 24 
500 000 people there would be no need to listen to the intellectual thoughts of the 
philosophies. Also the political change that took place for the better and the worsening
of 
the future of France would not have been needed if there was no social and economic 
woes in the country. 
Although the Political and intellectual factors of the revolution add wood to the 
fire the social and economic problems were the spark to that fire that lead to the
greatest 
revolution of all times. What the Revolution was less than anything else was a chance 
event. While it is a true that it took the world by surprise, nevertheless it was only
the 
culmination of a long period of travail-the sudden and violent termination of an 
enterprise on which men had labored for ten generations. On this it is believe that the 
social and economic disorder that took place in France in the eighteenth century was the

cause of the revolution. Resulting in both a social and economic scapegoat to the rest of

Europe. 
ve