FREE ESSAY ON CULTURE OF POVERTY

CULTURE OF POVERTY

"Culture of Poverty"
The "culture of poverty" was introduced or was popularized by Oscar Lewis while studying
poor families in Mexico and Puerto Rican families San Juan and New York. The theory
maintains that culturally based attitudes or predisposition such as "present-mindedness"
and "obsessive-consumption" are the major barriers to economic mobility for many of the
poor. Lewis' theory likewise implies that this is not a short-lived financial predicament
for the poor, but a way of life bolstered by the hopelessness of accomplishing even minor
economic goals. 
Lewis argues that there are certain cultural characteristics among the poor in industrial
capitalist societies. Lewis and others agree that poor people in such societies display
certain characteristics and values that are not held by non-poor in those same societies.
"These characteristics are: the absence of childhood as a specially prolonged and
protected state in the life-cycle, early initiation into sex, free unions or consensual
marriages, a relatively high incidents of abandonment of wives and children, a tend
toward female or mother centered families, a strong predisposition toward
authoritarianism, lack of privacy, verbal emphasis upon family solidarity which is only
rarely achieved because of sibling rivalry, and competition for limited goods and
material affection."(Lewis 1965) 
Lewis also believed the culture of poverty socialized the poor into political apathy,
immediate gratification, broken families and passive responses of their economic plight,
and he argued that the poor could not lose this debilitating culture even if they ceased
to be poor. 
Accordingly, the culture of poverty theory was investigated by social scientists,
economists, sociologists, anthropologists, and found to be false. Poor people have the
same culture, values, and social consciences as any other classification of people. It is
thought that by virtue of distinct controlling factors and lack of opportunities the poor
will have different behavior. The culture of poverty theory was essentially dead as far
as social science was concerned. Thus, the vicious cycle theory was found to be true. 
http://www.kub.nl/~fsw_2/home/worschot/rc19/papers/15.htm
http://sites.netscape.net/immortalgodking/poor
http://sites.netscape.net/immortalgodking/poor
http://sites.netscape.net/immortalgodking/poor
http://www.britanica.com/bcom/eb/article/printable/0/0,5722,118250,00.html
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/maxpages/classes/ECN358/undercla.htm