FREE ESSAY ON CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT 
The Debate over the merits of capital punishment has endured for years, and
continues to be an extremely indecisive and complicated issue. Adversaries of
capital punishment point to the Marshalls and the Millgards, while proponents point
to the Dahmers and Gacys. Society must be kept safe from the monstrous barbaric
acts of these individuals and other killers, by taking away their lives to function and
perform in our society. At the same time, we must insure that innocent people such
as Marshall and Millgard are never convicted or sentenced to death for a crime that
they did not commit. 
Many contend that the use of capital punishment as a form of deterrence does not
work, as there are no fewer murders on a per- capita basis in countries or states
that do have it, then those that do not. In order for capital punishment to work as a
deterrence, certain events must be present in the criminal's mind prior to committing
the offence. The criminal must be aware that others have been punished in the past
for the offence that he or she is planning, and that what happened to another
individual who committed this offence, can also happen to me.
B
ut individuals who commit any types of crime ranging from auto theft to 1st-Degree
Murder, never take into account the consequences of their actions. Deterrence to
crime, is rooted in the individuals themselves. Every human has a personal set of
conduct. How much they will and will not tolerate. How far they will and will not go.
This personal set of conduct can be made or be broken by friends, influences,
family, home, life, etc. An individual who is never taught some sort of restraint as a
child, will probably never understand any limit as to what they can do, until they
have learned it themselves. Therefore, capital punishment will never truly work as a
deterrent, because of human nature to ignore practised advice and to self learn.
There are those who claim that capital punishment is in itself a form of vengeance on
the killer. But isn't locking up a human being behind steel bars for many years,
vengeance itself? And is it humane that an individual who took the life of another,
should receive heating, clothing, indoor plumbing, 3 meals a day, while a homeless
person who has harmed no one receives nothing? Adversaries of capital punishment
claim that it is far more humane then having the state take away the life of the
individual. In February 1963, Gary McCorkell, a 19 year old sex offender, was
scheduled to hang. But just days before his execution, the then Liberal cabinet of
Lester Person commuted McCorkell to life in prison. Less than 20 years later,
McCorkell was arrested, tried, and convicted for the kidnapping and rape of a
10-year old Tenessee boy. He was sentanced to 63 years in prison. Prior to leaving
Canada, he was sought by Metro Police in the attempted murder of an 11-year old
boy.
What has been gained by this? Had McCorkell been executed in 1963, two boys
would never have had to have gone through the horror of being sexually abused.
These individuals may themselves become sex offenders, as many sex offenders
were sexually abused as children. McCorkell may have been a victim of sexually
assualt in the past, but that does not justify what he did. He did not do this once, he
killed two boys, and assaulted two others, leaving one for dead. He knew exactly
what he was doing. What right does this man have to live? He has ruined the lives of
4 children, what will he do in life that will compensate for that? What kind of a life
would the state have been taking away in this case? An innocent life? A forgiving
life? No, a life that was beyond the realm of reform, and did not care to be.
We must be careful. We must be very careful to never, even when suspicion may
cause considerable doubt, send an innocent person to be executed. It could have
happened to David Millgard, it could have happened to Donald Marshall. It
probably has even occured numerous times in the history of the earth. But with
proper police investigations, and where the evidence shows that the individual is a
threat to the peace of society as long as he or she is alive, capital punishment must
be used.